fuckboytempo

fuckboytempo:

saiyanhajime:

mira-of-sassgard:

flying-prussian-pugs:

rules-broken-fate-rewritten:

stickthinmodels:

feminspire:

YES!

IMPORTANT

the second one? i can buy that somewhat. the first one? breasts are sexual organs.

I SWEAR TO FUCK. NO. NO THEY ARE NOT. BREASTS ARE MEANT TO FEED BABIES. BREASTS ARE NOT MEANT FOR SEXUAL FUCKING PLEASURE. BREASTS SOLE EVOLUTIONARY PURPOSE ARE TO FEED THE YOUNG, NOT TO HUMOUR MEN IN BED.

Preach

This is a difficult one, because we have to question why mammary glands, in humans alone, are perceived as a sexual organ. Why are humans who are attracted to women sexually interested in breasts?

To add to the wtfuckary, males have mammary glands and would be capable of growing breasts and feeding young if they were prevented from entering male puberty, their testosterone was suppressed and replaced with oestrogen. Even after puberty, males who have testosterone suppressed and replaced with oestrogen will grow some breast tissue. Small amounts of breast development in males occurs naturally and is common.

There’s no obvious, biological explanation for why breasts are seen as sex organs in human society, but unfortunately they are. We need to change that perception, but to be honest, I’m not sure it’s possible. Men, and women, who are attracted to females aren’t suddenly going to stop finding their breasts sexy. 

It’s worth noting that men going topless in public is actually not as widely accepted as you may think. It’s generally considered vulgar away from private property, beaches, pools, etc - and so it should be, because I don’t want to see sweaty man flesh walking past when I’m eating dinner in a restaurant. In Europe, it’s commonplace to see women topless on normal beaches and in some places there are laws and fines preventing both sexes from going topless in urban areas. The sexes aren’t equal in this regard in any first world country, but this is less a problem in Europe where we are less prude overall than the USA.

Slightly irrelevant - But I love that it’s the girls in both images, on both sides, who are calling this out whilst the guys are apathetic. Depressingly accurate portrayal.

One major flaw though - you can find someone or just a body part sexy without sexualizing it, if that makes sense? My partner is pansexual and attracted to breasts, very much so, but they don’t bat an eye if they see someone with breasts topless unless the situation itself is sexual. I’m gay, and I find a flat chest just as sexy as others find breasts to be, but even if an attractive flat-chested person wanders by me with their shirt off, I’m not going to make the situation sexual, because they’re a stranger and that’s creepy. The thing that has to change is how people act around other people’s bodies. Find anyone as sexually appealing as you want, but it’s not normal to force them to act or dress a certain way just because some other people can’t control themselves.

And yeah it’s still a bit vulgar, but men aren’t demonized as sluts and whores for doing it. There are designated areas and beaches in the US where people with breasts can be topless also, but it’s considered taboo and kinky even though holy shit it’s just someone’s bare chest existing. The whole thing is misogynistic anyway: there are men with large breasts who aren’t shamed or sexualized at all for being topless, aside from the usual prejudice people have against anyone who is “abnormal” looking or fat. And there are women who have flat chests who still get shamed for being shirtless - hell, I babysat for a lady who had a fit when her 6 year old girl took her shirt off when playing rough outside. She was obviously was flat as a wall, she was 6, but anyone assigned female at birth is automatically assigned sexual as well, and must be hidden, or it’s suddenly unacceptable.

tl;dr it doesn’t matter why breasts are attractive, there’s nothing inherently evil with being attracted to breasts vs a flat chest, but it’s wrong in telling others what to do with themselves because of that.

You are 100% right, but then we have to ask what’s sexual about unaroused genitalia too? Should nudity just be ok full stop? And if it’s not, and if chests on show, male or female, isn’t okay, then why - like you say - is an arm? A leg? Why a face? Oh shit now we’re an Islamic state.

It’s not as simple as “women should be allowed to be topless in public just like men” because, like so many other things, there’s this world of culture that has accumulated over centuries that make *all of us* have illogical opinions and moral standings. To me, spitting in the street is just not ok, but it is to many and in some cultures it’s even the norm. 

To change this shit we have to change the entire culture. I’m sure it’ll come, to be honest, it just takes a fucking long time. Though it’s an interesting discussion non the less.

I am ill for the third time this summer.

I seem to get sick after brief periods of intense stress and long days. 

It’s “good” stress though - I mean, the first time was in Denmark when we had to get up at the crack of dawn to get a flight and the weather had dropped a bit and I was standing in the rain all day. Had a sore throat. Was vile.

Then the second was a cough that was probably lingering after that sore throat tbh, but there was a gap of feeling okay inbetween, and it was after my boyfriend went back home to the US. 

And now, after a series of early starts - one to go meet a client for freelance work the other side of the country, 2 for my part time job that has longer hours this time of year and 1 for the boot fair (giant yard sale/flea market, I was selling so had to be there at 6 eek).

nostalgica's recommended ginger tea is not only disgusting but doesn't seem to be working. So fml.

0ver9000percentdone

mira-of-sassgard:

flying-prussian-pugs:

rules-broken-fate-rewritten:

stickthinmodels:

feminspire:

YES!

IMPORTANT

the second one? i can buy that somewhat. the first one? breasts are sexual organs.

I SWEAR TO FUCK. NO. NO THEY ARE NOT. BREASTS ARE MEANT TO FEED BABIES. BREASTS ARE NOT MEANT FOR SEXUAL FUCKING PLEASURE. BREASTS SOLE EVOLUTIONARY PURPOSE ARE TO FEED THE YOUNG, NOT TO HUMOUR MEN IN BED.

Preach

This is a difficult one, because we have to question why mammary glands, in humans alone, are perceived as a sexual organ. Why are humans who are attracted to women sexually interested in breasts?

To add to the wtfuckary, males have mammary glands and would be capable of growing breasts and feeding young if they were prevented from entering male puberty, their testosterone was suppressed and replaced with oestrogen. Even after puberty, males who have testosterone suppressed and replaced with oestrogen will grow some breast tissue. Small amounts of breast development in males occurs naturally and is common.

There’s no obvious, biological explanation for why breasts are seen as sex organs in human society, but unfortunately they are. We need to change that perception, but to be honest, I’m not sure it’s possible. Men, and women, who are attracted to females aren’t suddenly going to stop finding their breasts sexy. 

It’s worth noting that men going topless in public is actually not as widely accepted as you may think. It’s generally considered vulgar away from private property, beaches, pools, etc - and so it should be, because I don’t want to see sweaty man flesh walking past when I’m eating dinner in a restaurant. In Europe, it’s commonplace to see women topless on normal beaches and in some places there are laws and fines preventing both sexes from going topless in urban areas. The sexes aren’t equal in this regard in any first world country, but this is less a problem in Europe where we are less prude overall than the USA.

Slightly irrelevant - But I love that it’s the girls in both images, on both sides, who are calling this out whilst the guys are apathetic. Depressingly accurate portrayal.